Carly Fiorina’s Got My Vote

It’s only February, but the 2010 elections are heating up fast…

In fact, ROTI has already chosen its favorite candidate of the upcoming election cycle. It’s Carly Fiorina, a California Republican who hopes to challenge longtime incumbent Senator Barbara Boxer in November. Fiorina may not be the most wise or deserving candidate out there, but she has one thing going for her that I personally find irresistible…a knack for enraging her opponents, entertaining onlookers, and setting fire to everything she touches.

What’s not to love?

Read more of this post

A Cruel Hoax

After Chris, Jonathan Horn, and I learned about the president’s $700-billion-bailout proposal and drafted the remarks announcing it to a stunned nation, Ed said the president wanted to see us in the Oval Office. The president looked relaxed and was sitting behind the Resolute desk. He felt he’d made the major decision that everyone had been asking for. That always seemed to relax him. He liked being decisive. Excuse me, boldly decisive. The president seemed to be thinking of his memoirs. “This might go in as a big decision,” he mused.

“Definitely, Mr. President,” someone else observed. “This is a large decision.”

The president asked his secretary, Karen, to bring him the Rose Garden remarks he’d just delivered that day, September 19, announcing his action plan. He got slightly exasperated when she was delayed in printing them out. When he finally got them, he put his half-glasses on and looked at them. “See, this was fine today,” he said. “But we got to make this understandable for the average cat.” He proposed an outline for another speech that talked about the situation our economy was in, how we’d gotten here, and how the administration’s plan was a solution.

“This is the last bullet we have,” the president said at one point, referring to the bailout. “If this doesn’t work…” He shook his head, and his voice trailed off. That wasn’t good enough for me. If this doesn’t work, then what? We’re done? America is over? I looked around at everyone else. What does that mean?

Just when you thought the flood of GWB Administration tell-alls had slowed to a trickle, one last gem comes rolling down the drainpipe.

It’s the work of Matt Latimer, who came to the White House as an ambitious young movement conservative, only to suffer severe disillusionment as he watched the Bush posse fumble helplessly with an economy sliding into ruin.

He’s written a piece called “Me Talk Presidential Some Day” for GQ, and it is bonafide.

The first inkling that Latimer is about to lower the boom on GWB comes when he describes how his dream job turned into a surreal sideshow:

In 2007 I finally made it to the Bush White House as a presidential speechwriter. But it was not at all what I envisioned. It was less like Aaron Sorkin’s The West Wing and more like The Office.

After watching Karl Rove’s bizarre farewell to White House staffers and hearing the president dismiss the conservative movement I believed in (“I know it sounds arrogant to say,” he told me, “but I redefined the Republican Party”), I thought I could muddle through till the end.

Washington might not have been the city I had dreamed of, but I figured things couldn’t get much worse.

The job mostly consisted of penning “legacy speeches,” touting the accomplishments of the administration in its final days. They’d plan to boast about how “the fundamentals of the economy are strong,” but after a while it became patently obvious that it wasn’t the case.

Pretty soon, Latimer found himself in a full-on crisis situation, as the White House tried to lead the country out of a disaster that it had helped precipitate with its happy-go-lucky economic message.

It didn’t help things that the GOP presidential nominee, John McCain, was trying to thread the needle between sticking close to the President to fire up the base and distancing himself from the President to attract moderate voters.

And then there was his brilliant idea to “suspend the campaign” when the economic poo really hit the fan. That did NOT go over well at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave:

Ed and the president decided to give a prime-time address to the nation, and Vice President Cheney was sent to the Hill to argue for our bill (a bill he may or may not have believed in) and was apparently hammered by House Republicans. There were reports that only four Republicans out of nearly 200 supported the plan. From what I was starting to glean about the whole scatterbrained operation, four seemed like too many. Hours before the president was to speak to the country, Senator John McCain’s presidential campaign informed Josh Bolten that McCain was going to phone the president and urge him to call off the address and instead hold an emergency economic summit in Washington. If the president did speak that night, the McCain campaign didn’t want him to outline any specific proposal.

Of course, this threw the proverbial monkey wrench into our plans—and at the eleventh hour. I overheard the president call McCain’s plan “a stunt.” Dana Perino said the negotiations were nearly over, and suddenly he was going to swoop in and muck things up?

The president’s political adviser, Barry Jackson, was blunt, calling McCain a “stupid prick.”

[...]

When the president came into the Family Theater to rehearse the speech in front of a teleprompter, he didn’t like the idea of just talking about principles. It sounded like the administration was backing away from its own plan (which it was).

“We can’t even defend our own proposal?” the president asked. “Why did we propose it, then?” This was not bold decision making. There were about a dozen people gathered in the theater to watch him rehearse, and all of us remained silent as the president looked at us for an answer.

The president walked over to sip some water from one of the bottles on the table near his lectern. “This speech is weak,” he said. He looked at me and Chris. “Frankly, I’m surprised, to be honest with you.”

There was more silence.

“Too late to cancel the speech?” the president asked into the air. He was joking…I think. Finally, Ed (who hadn’t exactly rushed to jump into the line of fire) explained that we had to make this change to the address because the proposal the president liked might not end up being the one he had to agree to.

“Then why the hell did I support it if I didn’t believe it would pass?” he snapped. There was yet another uncomfortable silence.

paulbush

The most brutal part of the tale comes when Bush realizes that his conception of the bailout plan is totally wrong, and it’s not the sweet deal for America that he’d tried to believe it was.

Try explaining THAT to the average cat.

Finally, the president directed us to try to put elements of his proposal back into the text. He wanted to explain what he was seeking and to defend it. He especially wanted Americans to know that his plan would likely see a return on the taxpayers’ investment. Under his proposal, he said, the federal government would buy troubled mortgages on the cheap and then resell them at a higher price when the market for them stabilized.

“We’re buying low and selling high,” he kept saying.

The problem was that his proposal didn’t work like that. One of the president’s staff members anxiously pulled a few of us aside. “The president is misunderstanding this proposal,” he warned. “He has the wrong idea in his head.” As it turned out, the plan wasn’t to buy low and sell high. In some cases, in fact, Secretary Paulson wanted to pay more than the securities were likely worth in order to put more money into the markets as soon as possible. This was not how the president’s proposal had been advertised to the public or the Congress. It wasn’t that the president didn’t understand what his administration wanted to do. It was that the treasury secretary didn’t seem to know, changed his mind, had misled the president, or some combination of the three.

[...]

After finally getting the speech draft turned around and sent back to the teleprompter technicians, we trudged back to the Family Theater, where the president rehearsed. In the theater, the president was clearly confused about how the government would buy these securities. He repeated his belief that the government was going to “buy low and sell high,” and he still didn’t understand why we hadn’t put that into the speech like he’d asked us to. When it was explained to him that his concept of the bailout proposal wasn’t correct, the president was momentarily speechless. He threw up his hands in frustration.

“Why did I sign on to this proposal if I don’t understand what it does?” he asked.

The president was clearly frustrated with what was going on, but there was little he could do at this late hour. He went up to take a nap, saying he was beat. He looked it. I’d never seen him more exhausted. His hair was out of place and shaggy. His face looked drained and pale. Even more distressing, he was wearing Crocs. As I looked at him I thought to myself, how many more crises can one guy take?

Probably the juiciest delights from Wareham’s account pertain to GWB’s takes on the 2008 presidential candidates. They were universally negative.

After all, GWB felt that he had personally transformed conservatism, and how could any of those chumps fill his shoes?

John McCain, the temperamental media darling, had spent most of the past eight years running against the Republican Party and the president—Republicans on Capitol Hill and at the White House hated him. Choosing John McCain as our standard-bearer would be the height of self-delusion. It would be like putting Camilla Parker Bowles in charge of the Princess Diana Foundation.

As it turned out, I was the one who was deluded. The people I worked with in the White House were the most loyal of the Bush loyalists. Dana Perino was so sensitive to criticism of Bush that she once said she couldn’t watch the Democratic convention because it would be “too mean” to the president. Yet I watched them embrace McCain enthusiastically—backing a guy who’d worked so hard to undermine them. It was a cynical bargain.

The president, like me, didn’t seem to be in love with any of the available options. He always believed Hillary Clinton would be the Democratic nominee. “Wait till her fat keister is sitting at this desk,” he once said (except he didn’t say “keister”).

bushhill

He didn’t think much of Barack Obama. After one of Obama’s blistering speeches against the administration, the president had a very human reaction: He was ticked off. He came in one day to rehearse a speech, fuming. “This is a dangerous world,” he said for no apparent reason, “and this cat isn’t remotely qualified to handle it. This guy has no clue, I promise you.”

He wound himself up even more. “You think I wasn’t qualified?” he said to no one in particular. “I was qualified.”

[...]

Bush seemed to feel considerable unease with the choice of McCain as well. I think he liked Romney best. (The rumor was that so did Karl Rove.) My guess was the president hadn’t so easily forgotten the endless slights he’d suffered, but there was little he could do. To him, McCain’s defeat would be a repudiation of the Bush administration, so McCain had to win. The president, who had quite a good political mind, was clearly not impressed with the McCain operation.

I was once in the Oval Office when the president was told a campaign event in Phoenix he was to attend with McCain suddenly had to be closed to the press. The president didn’t understand why when the whole purpose of holding the event had been to show Bush and McCain together so the press would stop asking why the two wouldn’t be seen together. If the event was closed to the press, the whole thing didn’t make sense.

“If he doesn’t want me to go, fine,” the president said. “I’ve got better things to do.”

gwb jmcc

Eventually, someone informed the president that the reason the event was closed was that McCain was having trouble getting a crowd. Bush was incredulous—and to the point. “He can’t get 500 people to show up for an event in his hometown?” he asked. No one said anything, and we went on to another topic. But the president couldn’t let the matter drop. “He couldn’t get 500 people? I could get that many people to turn out in Crawford.” He shook his head. “This is a five-spiral crash, boys.”

We tried to move on to something else. But the president wouldn’t let go. He was stuck on the Phoenix event. At one point, he looked off into space and said to no one in particular, “What is this—a cruel hoax?”

Chris and I were tickled by that comment. For weeks, we would look for ways to use it. “They are out of Diet Pepsis at the mess. What is this, a cruel hoax?” I went to dinner with a friend. “They don’t have cheeseburgers?” I said, looking at the menu. “What is this, a cruel hoax?”

Bush’s take on Palin was equally amusing. We’re so used to thinking of the former POTUS as a dunce, so it’s always great when a moment of pure clarity pokes through.

Even the normally levelheaded Raul Yanes, the president’s staff secretary, was overtaken by Palin mania. He’d been slightly annoyed with me for not jumping on the McCain bandwagon and for saying aloud that I thought McCain would lose. Now, of course, I had to be enthusiastic about the ticket. “You still think we’re going to lose?” he asked me laughingly.

“Yep,” I replied.

Raul looked incredulous. “Well, you obviously don’t believe in facts!”

I was about to be engulfed by a tidal wave of Palin euphoria when someone—someone I didn’t expect—planted my feet back on the ground. After Palin’s selection was announced, the same people who demanded I acknowledge the brilliance of McCain’s choice expected the president to join them in their high-fiving tizzy. It was clear, though, that the president, ever the skilled politician, had concerns about the choice of Palin, which he called “interesting.” That was the equivalent of calling a fireworks display “satisfactory.”

“I’m trying to remember if I’ve met her before. I’m sure I must have.” His eyes twinkled, then he asked, “What is she, the governor of Guam?”

Everyone in the room seemed to look at him in horror, their mouths agape. When Ed told him that conservatives were greeting the choice enthusiastically, he replied, “Look, I’m a team player, I’m on board.” He thought about it for a minute. “She’s interesting,” he said again. “You know, just wait a few days until the bloom is off the rose.”

Then he made a very smart assessment.

“This woman is being put into a position she is not even remotely prepared for,” he said. “She hasn’t spent one day on the national level. Neither has her family. Let’s wait and see how she looks five days out.”

Thank you, Matt Latimer, for giving us this glimpse of Dubya’s last days, and showing him at his best and his worst. History owes you a debt of gratitude.

To read the full article – including a tasty gem about how a top economic advisor was best known for deploying whoopie cushions around the West Wing – click here.

Homeland to be secured by ass-kicking lesbian!

News outlets are now reporting that Arizona’s governor, Janet Napolitano, is going to be named Secretary of Homeland Security by President-elect Obama.

POLITICO reports:

Napolitano brings law and order experience from her stint as the Grand Canyon State’s first female attorney general. One of the nation’s most prominent female elected officials, she made frequent appearances on behalf of Barack Obama during the campaign. She was reelected to a second four-year term in 2006.

Transition insiders have long expected that she would be offered a Cabinet slot, although she had also been mentioned for other posts, including attorney general.

Napolitano, 50, endorsed Obama in early January, just as the primaries were kicking off, and the female up-and-comer’s decision to back the Illinois senator got widespread coverage.

In 2005, Time magazine named her one of America’s five best governors, calling her “A Mountaineer on the Political Rise.”

Napolitano is extremely popular in Arizona, and since she was an early Obama supporter, many people were wondering why she was never shortlisted for VP, like Kansas Governor Sebelius or other prominent female possibilities.

To this, political columnists for mainstream publications would say, “Well, uh, there might be some problems with that, anyway, what a nice day it is today!!”

But since ROTI is not hindered by things like public outrage, we’re gonna come right out and say it. Janet Napolitano is clearly a lesbian, and you don’t win Virginia, Indiana and North Carolina with a geigh on the ticket. Sad but true.

Nobody in the mainstream media will acknowledge this, but it’s pretty well known if you’ve spent any time in the Grand Canyon State that the Governor is unmarried, unlinked to any gentlemen, and sports a style that would fit right in at a WeHo bar. (Actually, the alt-weekly Phoenix New Times was willing to go there.)

So while this will go unremarked-upon by almost every publication and TV show, we have reached yet another barrier-breaking moment in American politics. America takes yet another step into the 21st century! Not only will we be entrusting homeland security (and associated issues like immigration) to a strong, independent, self-made woman – we’ll be protected by a tough, no-nonsense ass-kicking (albeit closeted) lesbian!

We’re pretty pleased about this most of all because beyond identity politics, Napolitano is smart, capable and all-around pretty awesome. And as Governor of a border state, she truly understands the correct approach to our country’s immigration problems. (For reference, immigration was one of the few issues that former border state Governor George W. Bush was totally right about.)

The interesting side story to this is that Napolitano is term-limited, and would be done as Gov. in 2010 regardless. Many people speculated that she might take on John McCain for his Senate seat.

As 538 reports, the polling is mixed on this matchup:

Napolitano, popular among her constituents as well as with the netroots, was to be term-limited in 2010, but was reportedly considering a run for Arizona’s Class 3 senate seat, currently occupied by John McCain. At least one poll had shown Napolitano ahead of McCain in a trial-heat matchup, although McCain remains fairly popular in Arizona and had led Napolitano in other polling of the state.

A promotion to Homeland Security would not inherently dash Napolitano’s prospects of running for the Senate. Florida’s Mel Martinez, George W. Bush’s Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, stepped down from his position in 2003 to run for Florida’s open senate seat, and last year, Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns did the same to run for Nebraska’s; both Republicans won. Martinez and Johanns, however, had served in their positions for the better part of three years, whereas Napolitano would presumably have to vacate her position by early 2010 to run a competitive race against McCain. Martinez and Johanns, moreover, were running for open seats that they were favored to pick up, whereas Napolitano would have to run against one of the icons of the Senate, albeit one who recently suffered a notable electoral defeat.

[...]

There is also a chance — maybe even a fairly good chance — that John McCain chooses not to run, although my gut-level read of the situation is that McCain would not want to end his career on a losing streak and therefore becomes less likely to retire if he does not have to worry about Napolitano.

Piscataquis poor effort.

Guess how many counties John McCain won in all of New England?

One. One freaking county.

So where did Johnny Mac pull it off?

Surely in his beloved state of New Hampshire, where he flew on the last weekend of the election. Oh…no? Not New Hampshire. Lost every county in New Hampshire? Well, he narrowly lost three counties, that’s like a moral victory. Sigh.

OK, one of those wealthy New York City suburbs in Connecticut. They gotta be pretty conservative there. Ohhh they all voted for Obama too?

No!! No we got it – that one congressional district in Maine worth one electoral vote that they put money into after their campaign in Michigan collapsed! God love ya, McCain, so effing mavericky!!

No, he lost that too.

The only county in ALL of New England captured by John McCain was in central Maine: Piscataquis County. This county had 17,235 people at the time of the last census. 98% white, median salary $28 grand. McCain won this county by 4,785 to 4,430.

Okay, now we feel bad for kicking a guy when he’s down. But honestly, this is unreal. The fact that Obama took virtually every county in New England is shocking.

McCain won most of the counties in states that he lost, like Pennsylvania and Virginia. Obama won more than a dozen counties in Texas, cut a swath of counties through the South, and even took four counties in McCain’s home state of Arizona. Conversely, McCain took quite a few counties in Illinois.

But in New England? Obama tossed a one-hitter through six.

And the hit was a broken bat bloop that looked like a poop.

What happened here? The Republican Party was a force in the Northeast as recently as twenty years ago.

The incompetent campaign “masterminded” by Steve Schmidt and Rick Davis takes a lot of the blame. Obama’s massive fundraising from Massachusetts and Connecticut didn’t hurt his chances in the rest of the states. Southern New Hampshire, for example, was utterly blanketed in ads through the Boston media market. The economic crisis and long Republican reign spelled defeat for the GOP on a statewide basis in a generally liberal region.

But they had McCain! His credentials going into this race had to endear him to a variety of regions throughout New England…probably not whole states, but a handful of counties at least. Didn’t happen.

The real reason for the region-wide wipeout is the social agenda of the (less populous) states that voted all their counties the other way. All two of ‘em.

Culture wars used to be a winning gameplan for the Republicans, but when you get blasted this badly in a region worth 34 electoral votes, it’s time to start rethinking the Palin in 2012 strategy.

Up yours, Alaska and Oklahoma.

Signed, New England

Gein Wein vs. Chuck Kraut

Gene Weingarten is nominally the Washington Post’s humor writer, but he also has other sidelines going, like the article about a classical violinist playing in a subway station that won him a Pulitzer Prize last year, and the weekly chats he conducts on the Post’s website, which often delve into topics such as “how many squares of toilet paper do you use” and the appeal of visible panty lines.

However, Weingarten recently utilized his chat to air his grievances regarding Washington’s finest wheelchair-bound conservative, and fellow Post columnist, Charles Krauthammer, and a recent column containing a pretty extreme claim. After writing to Krauthammer without getting a response, he took his gripes public.

Dear Charles Krauthammer:

As a fellow pundit, I understand the temptation to make extreme, unsupportable pronouncements for the sake of drama or in the heat of political passion. I, for example, have written on more than one occasion that the current vice president of the United States is Lucifer the Dastard, Harvester of Souls. I confess today in the light of reason that I cannot prove this, however likely it might be.

Moreover, I sympathize with the impulse to overstate the virtues a person at his or her funeral. On the tongue of the compassionate eulogist, even a juiceless reprobate attains a little virtue and personality.

So, in short, I do understand what you did and why you did it. It still doesn’t make it any more defensible. You must be spanked for it. I shall do so now.

In your last column you declared John McCain “the most worthy presidential candidate ever to be denied the prize.”

Had you confined the field of candidates to only those, say, in your lifetime, you would merely have been mistaken. But “ever” transforms error into folly. It dishonors your venerable column, with which I never agree but which almost always admire.

“Worthy” is a word that allows for broad interpretation. The dictionary says: “Estimable,” “honorable,” and “deserving.” In the context at hand, I’ll add, “fit to serve.”

It is not necessary to denigrate John McCain in order to establish the enormity of your overstatement. For the purpose of this argument I will stipulate that McCain qualifies as “worthy.” This requires me to ignore the ghastliness of his vice presidential selection, which I consider reckless, irresponsible, opportunistic, deeply cynical, misogynistic, lascivious, contemptuous of the public’s intelligence, and, most to the point, unpatriotic. It was a raised middle finger to the rest of the nation.

However, your problem here is not in praising McCain, who is in most other ways praiseworthy. Your problem, as I have said, is your unjustifiable use of the superlative. John McCain is a former war hero and an able United States senator who was reprimanded only once for ethics violations, and who will mostly be remembered, if he is remembered at all, for that ludicrous vice presidential choice, and for some bill about the intricacies of campaign finance reform (creating a law that you hate and would like to see repealed.)

Below is a list of guys you have declared him more worthy than.

Ready, Charles?

Good! This will hurt a little.

1. Henry Clay. Founder of the Whig party, one of the earliest supporters of freeing slaves, visionary leader, champion of a strong and indivisible union, a giant figure in American history, unsullied by scandal, admired even by his enemies. In 1957 a U.S. Senate committee chaired by John F. Kennedy named Clay one of the five greatest senators in American history. Among Clay’s most vocal admirers was Abraham Lincoln.

2. Daniel Webster. Hey, Charles, guess what? Webster is also on that list of five! He was also a little more articulate than McCain, and forever immortalized as a great lawyer and orator in the play “The Devil and Daniel Webster.” A speech he gave in 1830, on the issue of nullification, is generally regarded as the greatest speech ever given in Congress, immortalized in more than one painting. (Andrew Wyeth never painted “McCain delivers the McCain-Feingold Act.”) Oh, yeah, Webster was one of the biographies in “Profiles in Courage.” JFK called his defense of the 1850 compromise, despite the risk to his presidential ambitions and the denunciations he faced from the north, one of the “greatest acts of courageous principle” in the history of the Senate.

3. Samuel J. Tilden, from whom the presidency was corruptly stolen in 1876 but whose patriotism remained so stalwart that he instructed his allies to accept the decision in the interest of national harmony, and to avoid a constitutional crisis. His tombstone reads: “I Still Trust in The People”. He was a great fighter against political corruption.

4. Alfred E. Smith, one of the most dedicated political reformers in the 20th century, destroyer of the sweatshop. “Smith is the best of all of these on your list,” says a friend of mine who is a presidential historian and has researched the life of Smith.

Worthier than McCain: You don’t see presidential contenders doing hilarious standup at the Johnny Mac Dinner!

5. Charles Evans Hughes. Lessee, before his unsuccessful campaign against Woodrow Wilson, Hughes served as a justice of the Supreme Court. After his loss, he returned to the court as its chief justice. So he was a pretty worthy guy. He boldly led the resistance to FDR’s craven political attempt to pack the Supreme Court. He was a conservative, but a highly principled one: He extended the definition of slavery to include peonage, which were horrendous conditions of servitude,. And he wrote the visionary opinion declaring that prior restraint of the press was unconstitutional. If you can define worthiness in part by who thinks you are worthy, Hughes’s closest colleagues on the court were Lewis Brandeis, Harlan Fiske Stone and Benjamin Cardozo.

I do think it curious, Charles, that you didn’t consider as more worthy Barry Goldwater, the patron saint, and conscience, of the neoconservative movement. And you’ll note I didn’t even try to make the case for Al Gore or Adlai Stevenson, though I personally find them “worthier” than McCain. We’d never agree on them, anyway. And I didn’t need them to make my case. Did I?

No response yet from Krauthammer! But we think the case was pretty effectively made…

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.